open source in enterprise level deployments

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

the discussion about the deployment of open source software in large scale enterprise setups and in the governmental environment makes me sick. every time the argument about missing security and not enterprise level software and so on starts i could just laugh about the idiots telling you the stuff. most of them have no clue that the tools they use day to day to deploy are in fact open source.

what do most large scale enterprise setups look like today? java, all over. ok, how do you serve java on an enterprise level? right, with websphere. ever wondered why you can restart an IBM httpd with apachectl restart? ok, discussed that point, which OS do you use? of course something commercial, solaris? cool, they market their OS as open source in the meantime and there are lots of tools in there that are open source already. shell bash? editor vim?

ok, i just want to state once and for all times. all those ones that state that commercial software is more enterprise level than open source: think before you talk and the best would be to just stop brain vomiting your so called expert knowledge and keep your slimy profit greed for you.

the real challenge with open source is the new concepts that base on know how and service and not on stupid reselling of licences.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: open source in enterprise level deployments.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://who.wants.in/mt/mt-tb.cgi/23

2 Comments

lev said:

it seems there is someone really angry :)
but you are absolutely right!
also an often seen argument of those people is that you don't get "official support" for open source software. but let's face it, how does official support look like for commercial closed source software? ;)
i would not trust the code more only because i paid for it and at least i can proof open source software by myself for security...

lenz Author Profile Page said:

well the support thing is a good point. what do you prefer, a service contract you pay for and in case of a problem (motly a bug) the answer is "thanks for reporting this one, we'll include a patch in the next version" or a "looks like a bug, here is a patch". i go for the no-cost-but-problem-solving apporoach.

Leave a comment

Side Blog

sidenote

i found a long searched feature for OS X today: sidenote is a note taking application that just works the way you like it

work environments

can be destructive or supportive. here are some fancy ones.

pictures ...

manu posted some pictures from otaki forks

no open source HAd

it is a pitty, not because the design is so nice but because of the fact that governmental entities are so 20th century from time to time ... the answer to the question if i am allowed to open source the HAd that i wrote they told me that "it is not the way we do it here" ... so, no, i can't release it. sorry

assembling RBLs

a nice article about assembling RBLs and setting up tarpits under free/openBSD an be found here

instantbird

a promising new jabber client based on mozilla and pidgin (which is still gaim for me) can be found here

DAViCal

the apple iCal server failed so i'll try the next one and give andrews daemon a go

iCal server

i got bored with different calendars and gave this one a try totday. success and failure will be reported.

russia the new silicon valley?

as nat wrote here on o'reilly radar russia tries to keep up with innovative new companies

google phone stack

the google phone stack is backed quite well by big players.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by lenz published on December 19, 2007 12:12 PM.

erlang @ amazon was the previous entry in this blog.

CMSs is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.